- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- KVC65 vs KM50
Kenwood KVC65 vs Kraftsman KM50
What KVC65 does better (1) and where KM50 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
KVC65KM50
| KVC65 | KM50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 315 mm | 350 mm | −35 mm |
| Width | 225 mm | 189 mm | +36 mm |
| Depth | 395 mm | 378 mm | +17 mm |
| Weight | 9.5 kg | 11.3 kg | −1.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KVC65 better than KM50?
- Power1,200 W vs 800 W+50%
Why is KM50 better than KVC65?
- Number of accessories4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,200 W | 800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 5 l |
| Speed settings | — | 8 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | No |
| Pulse function | No | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Built-in scale | Yes | — |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater |
| Number of accessories | 4 | 5 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix, Weigh | Knead, Whisk, Mix |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | — |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Housing | — | Stainless steel |
| Weight | 9.5 kg | 11.3 kg |
| Width | 225 mm | 189 mm |
| Height | 315 mm | 350 mm |
| Depth | 395 mm | 378 mm |
| Series | Kenwood Chef Baker | — |
