- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- KVC65 vs KZM35
Kenwood KVC65 vs Kenwood KZM35
What KVC65 does better (4) and where KZM35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
KVC65KZM35
| KVC65 | KZM35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 315 mm | 300 mm | +15 mm |
| Width | 225 mm | 180 mm | +45 mm |
| Depth | 395 mm | 335 mm | +60 mm |
| Weight | 9.5 kg | 6.3 kg | +3.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KVC65 better than KZM35?
- Power1,200 W vs 800 W+50%
- Number of accessories4 vs 22×
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.1 l+22%
- TimerYes · KZM35: No
Why is KZM35 better than KVC65?
- Planetary mixing actionNo · KVC65: Yes
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · KVC65: Yes
- Pulse functionNo · KVC65: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,200 W | 800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 4.1 l |
| Speed settings | — | 6 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | Yes |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | — | Yes |
| Pulse function | No | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Built-in scale | Yes | — |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | — |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook | Whisk, Food processor |
| Number of accessories | 4 | 2 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix, Weigh | Knead, Whisk, Mix |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | — |
| Timer | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Housing | — | Stainless steel |
| Weight | 9.5 kg | 6.3 kg |
| Width | 225 mm | 180 mm |
| Height | 315 mm | 300 mm |
| Depth | 395 mm | 335 mm |
| Series | Kenwood Chef Baker | — |
