3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. kHealthy vs Thunder

Kenwood kHealthy vs Ufesa Thunder

What kHealthy does better (2) and where Thunder wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood kHealthy
Kenwood · 2024kHealthy
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
vs
Ufesa Thunder
Ufesa · 2024Thunder
7.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$75
8.4Power & capacity7.3
6.7Versatility4.1
4.8Controls & convenience8.7

Why is kHealthy better than Thunder?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is Thunder better than kHealthy?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood kHealthyKenwood kHealthy≈ US$708.0
Ufesa ThunderUfesa Thunder≈ US$757.7
Power & capacity
Power—1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l9 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishNo—
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width385 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare