3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 15 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FDP31 vs SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer

Kenwood FDP31 vs Swan SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer

What FDP31 does better (3) and where SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood FDP31
Kenwood · 2025FDP31
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$75
Higher score
vs
Swan SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer
5.9Score
0 advantages
5.0Power & capacity3.9
7.3Versatility3.0
5.8Controls & convenience8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FDP31SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer
200 × 365190220 × 260180
FDP31SP42010 LebensmittelzerkleinererDifference
Height365 mm260 mm+105 mm
Width200 mm220 mm−20 mm
Depth190 mm180 mm+10 mm
Weight2.3 kg1.9 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FDP31 better than SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer?

  1. Power800 W vs 300 W2.7×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.1 l vs 1.8 l+17%
  3. Pulse functionYes · SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer: No

Why is SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer better than FDP31?

SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood FDP31Kenwood FDP31≈ US$756.8
Power & capacity
Power800 W300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.1 l1.8 l
Speed settings22
Top speed—26,000 rpm
Mixing & processing
Pulse functionYesNo
Soft startNoNo
Bowl material—Glass
Attachments includedBlender jug—
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Chop, SliceChop, Crush ice, Blend
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
HousingPlastic—
Cord storageYes—
Weight2.3 kg1.9 kg
Width200 mm220 mm
Height365 mm260 mm
Depth190 mm180 mm
ColoursGreySilver, Black
SeriesKenwood Multipro—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare