3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FDM316SS vs FP195 Multipro Compact

Kenwood FDM316SS vs Kenwood FP195 Multipro Compact

What FDM316SS does better (3) and where FP195 Multipro Compact wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood FDM316SS
Kenwood · 2020FDM316SS
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$180
Higher score
vs
Kenwood FP195 Multipro Compact
Kenwood · 2020FP195 Multipro Compact
6.6Score
0 advantages
6.3Power & capacity3.4
4.9Versatility7.3
8.8Controls & convenience8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FDM316SSFP195 Multipro Compact
200 × 360320 × 476216
FDM316SSFP195 Multipro CompactDifference
Height360 mm476 mm−116 mm
Width200 mm320 mm−120 mm
Weight8.6 kg3.9 kg+4.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FDM316SS better than FP195 Multipro Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.1 l vs 1.4 l+50%
  2. Power800 W vs 600 W+33%
  3. Speed settings3 vs 2+50%

Why is FP195 Multipro Compact better than FDM316SS?

FP195 Multipro Compact has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood FDM316SSKenwood FDM316SS≈ US$1807.9
Power & capacity
Power800 W600 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.1 l1.4 l
Speed settings32
Mixing & processing
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionYesYes
Soft startNoNo
Bowl materialMetalStainless steel
Attachments includedSpatula, Scale—
Number of accessories2—
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, Chop, SliceMix, Chop, Slice, Blend
Controls & smart
DisplayLCD—
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
HousingMetalStainless steel
Weight8.6 kg3.9 kg
Width200 mm320 mm
Height360 mm476 mm
Depth—216 mm
ColoursGreySilver
SeriesKenwood Compact—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare