- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AFT3200 vs QD464
Kalorik AFT3200 vs TESLA QD464
What AFT3200 does better (4) and where QD464 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is AFT3200 better than QD464?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)11 l vs 9 l+22%
- BakingYes · QD464: No
- Grill functionYes · QD464: No
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
Why is QD464 better than AFT3200?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AFT3200: Yes
- Power2,460 W vs 2,900 W+18%
- TimerNo · AFT3200: Yes
- Non-stick coatingNo · AFT3200: Yes
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,460 W | 2,900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 11 l | 9 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat, Pizza | Cook, Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Timer | No | Yes |
| App control | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Ceramic |
| Width | — | 380 mm |
| Height | — | 300 mm |
| Depth | — | 400 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
