2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AFT2100 vs AF938TFT

Kalorik AFT2100 vs Webber AF938TFT

What AFT2100 does better (1) and where AF938TFT wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kalorik AFT2100
Kalorik · 2026AFT2100
7.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
vs
Webber AF938TFT
Webber · 2026AF938TFT
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
6.3Power & capacity8.3
7.7Versatility7.7
6.4Controls & convenience7.5

Why is AFT2100 better than AF938TFT?

  1. Viewing windowYes · AF938TFT: No

Why is AF938TFT better than AFT2100?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 8 l+33%
  2. Power2,000 W vs 2,200 W+10%
  3. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · AFT2100: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Kalorik AFT2100Kalorik AFT2100≈ US$807.4
Webber AF938TFTWebber AF938TFT≈ US$808.8
Power & capacity
Power2,000 W2,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l8 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
App control—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackGrey, Black, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare