2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AFT2100 vs SHFS 2150

Kalorik AFT2100 vs Silvercrest SHFS 2150

What AFT2100 does better (3) and where SHFS 2150 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kalorik AFT2100
Kalorik · 2026AFT2100
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
vs
Silvercrest SHFS 2150
Silvercrest · 2026SHFS 2150
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$75
6.3Power & capacity5.9
7.7Versatility7.7
6.4Controls & convenience3.1

Why is AFT2100 better than SHFS 2150?

  1. Viewing windowYes · SHFS 2150: No
  2. DisplayLED vs None (dials / switches)
  3. TimerYes · SHFS 2150: No

Why is SHFS 2150 better than AFT2100?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 7 l+17%
  2. Power2,000 W vs 2,150 W+7%
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · AFT2100: Yes
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Kalorik AFT2100Kalorik AFT2100≈ US$807.4
Power & capacity
Power2,000 W2,150 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l7 l
Automatic programmes—3
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesNo
App control—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare