2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Sweet 2326p vs TRI-67563

Jocca Sweet 2326p vs Lund TRI-67563

What Sweet 2326p does better (2) and where TRI-67563 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Jocca Sweet 2326p
Jocca · 2026Sweet 2326p
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$75
vs
Lund TRI-67563
Lund · 2026TRI-67563
6.6Score
6 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity5.2
4.1Versatility7.7
3.1Controls & convenience6.1

Why is Sweet 2326p better than TRI-67563?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is TRI-67563 better than Sweet 2326p?

  1. Power1,450 W vs 2,200 W+52%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.8 l vs 4 l+5%
  3. BakingNo · Sweet 2326p: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · Sweet 2326p: Yes
  5. TimerNo · Sweet 2326p: Yes
  6. Non-stick coatingNo · Sweet 2326p: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Jocca Sweet 2326pJocca Sweet 2326p≈ US$754.0
Lund TRI-67563Lund TRI-67563≈ US$806.6
Power & capacity
Power1,450 W2,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.8 l4 l
Automatic programmes3—
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Roast, ReheatAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursPink—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare