- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 2192 vs NA321
Jocca 2192 vs Philips NA321
What 2192 does better (3) and where NA321 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
2192NA321
| 2192 | NA321 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 315 mm | 294 mm | +21 mm |
| Width | 280 mm | 286 mm | −6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 2192 better than NA321?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 4.2 l+55%
- Power1,600 W vs 1,400 W+14%
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is NA321 better than 2192?
NA321 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.5 l | 4.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Design & build | ||
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 280 mm | 286 mm |
| Height | 315 mm | 294 mm |
| Depth | 370 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
