3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 2097 vs NA552

Jocca 2097 vs Philips NA552

What 2097 does better (2) and where NA552 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Jocca 2097
Jocca · 20252097
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$180
vs
Philips NA552
Philips · 2025NA552
9.4Score
6 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
6.9Power & capacity9.6
7.6Versatility8.5

Why is 2097 better than NA552?

  1. Grill functionYes · NA552: No
  2. Keep warmYes · NA552: No

Why is NA552 better than 2097?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 2,750 W+53%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
  3. BakingNo · 2097: Yes
  4. DehydratingNo · 2097: Yes
  5. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
  6. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Jocca 2097Jocca 2097≈ US$1808.2
Philips NA552Philips NA552≈ US$1909.4
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l9 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—40 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Roast, Grill, Keep warmAir fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—Yes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Cord storage—Yes
Height—382 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare