2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PC-MA WOOZOO vs ON400

Iris Ohyama PC-MA WOOZOO vs Ninja ON400

What PC-MA WOOZOO does better (0) and where ON400 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Iris Ohyama PC-MA WOOZOO
Iris Ohyama · 2023PC-MA WOOZOO
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ US$160
vs
Ninja ON400
Ninja · 2024ON400
8.2Score
8 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
2.3Power & capacity6.8
4.3Versatility9.2
8.0Controls & convenience7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PC-MA WOOZOOON400
300 × 224330 × 310350
PC-MA WOOZOOON400Difference
Height224 mm310 mm−86 mm
Width300 mm330 mm−30 mm
Weight3.9 kg6.5 kg−2.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PC-MA WOOZOO better than ON400?

PC-MA WOOZOO has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ON400 better than PC-MA WOOZOO?

  1. Power800 W vs 1,760 W2.2×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 5.7 l+90%
  3. Automatic programmes6 vs 10+67%
  4. Slow cookingNo · PC-MA WOOZOO: Yes
  5. Sauté / searNo · PC-MA WOOZOO: Yes
  6. Air fryingNo · PC-MA WOOZOO: Yes
  7. BakingNo · PC-MA WOOZOO: Yes
  8. Non-stick coatingNo · PC-MA WOOZOO: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja ON400Ninja ON400≈ US$1408.2
Power & capacity
Power800 W1,760 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l5.7 l
Automatic programmes610
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteam, Pressure cook, RiceSteam, Sauté, Slow cook, Pressure cook, Air fry, Bake
Pressure cookingYesYes
Slow cookingNoYes
SteamingYesYes
Sauté / searNoYes
Sous-videNoNo
Yoghurt programmeNoNo
Air fryingNoYes
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCD—
TimerYes—
Delay startYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
Weight3.9 kg6.5 kg
Width300 mm330 mm
Height224 mm310 mm
Depth—350 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare