- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- CT03 vs FRH 1850
HAIMEEC CT03 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1850
What CT03 does better (1) and where FRH 1850 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is CT03 better than FRH 1850?
- Non-stick coatingYes · FRH 1850: No
Why is FRH 1850 better than CT03?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 7.5 l+25%
- Grill functionNo · CT03: Yes
- DehydratingNo · CT03: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,870 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 7.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 10 |
| Max. temperature | — | 230 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Air fry, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | Yes |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | Yes |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | LED |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | — | Metal |
| Width | 270 mm | — |
| Height | 260 mm | — |
| Depth | 350 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
