- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- CT03 vs Raf R.50
HAIMEEC CT03 vs OBA Raf R.50
What CT03 does better (0) and where Raf R.50 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is CT03 better than Raf R.50?
CT03 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Raf R.50 better than CT03?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 7 l+17%
- BakingNo · CT03: Yes
- Grill functionNo · CT03: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 2,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 7 l |
| Max. temperature | — | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | — |
| Housing | — | Plastic |
| Width | 270 mm | — |
| Height | 260 mm | — |
| Depth | 350 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
