- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 3in1 vs Mastic
GOURMETmaxx 3in1 vs Lehmann Mastic
What 3in1 does better (1) and where Mastic wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is 3in1 better than Mastic?
- Power1,500 W vs 1,300 W+15%
Why is Mastic better than 3in1?
- Heating / cooking functionNo · 3in1: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,300 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 5 l |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | Yes | — |
| Pulse function | No | — |
| Soft start | No | — |
| Heating / cooking function | No | Yes |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook | — |
| Number of accessories | 2 | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix | Knead, Mix, Blend, Cook |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Colours | Black | — |
