2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 2 in 1: vs AF900

GOURMETmaxx 2 in 1: vs Webber AF900

What 2 in 1: does better (5) and where AF900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

GOURMETmaxx 2 in 1:
GOURMETmaxx · 20262 in 1:
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
vs
Webber AF900
Webber · 2026AF900
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$75
4.4Power & capacity5.7
8.9Versatility6.7
8.7Controls & convenience7.8

Why is 2 in 1: better than AF900?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.5 l+11%
  2. BakingYes · AF900: No
  3. Grill functionYes · AF900: No
  4. DehydratingYes · AF900: No
  5. Non-stick coatingYes · AF900: No

Why is AF900 better than 2 in 1:?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  2. Power2,000 W vs 2,400 W+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Webber AF900Webber AF900≈ US$757.2
Power & capacity
Power2,000 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.5 l
Automatic programmes3—
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones12
Sync / match finish—No
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer90 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticCeramic
Depth443 mm—
ColoursBlackGrey, Black, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare