3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. MMC800CW vs MX-4870

Gorenje MMC800CW vs Tristar MX-4870

What MMC800CW does better (1) and where MX-4870 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Gorenje MMC800CW
Gorenje · 2025MMC800CW
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$65
vs
Tristar MX-4870
Tristar · 2026MX-4870
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
3.9Power & capacity4.5
3.3Versatility7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MMC800CWMX-4870
338 × 308220209 × 320351
MMC800CWMX-4870Difference
Height308 mm320 mm−12 mm
Width338 mm209 mm+129 mm
Depth220 mm351 mm−131 mm
Weight4.2 kg2.2 kg+2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MMC800CW better than MX-4870?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.5 l+11%

Why is MX-4870 better than MMC800CW?

  1. Number of accessories2 vs 52.5×
  2. Speed settings6 vs 122×
  3. Heating / cooking functionNo · MMC800CW: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Gorenje MMC800CWGorenje MMC800CW≈ US$654.0
Tristar MX-4870Tristar MX-4870≈ US$654.8
Power & capacity
Power800 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.5 l
Speed settings612
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoNo
Mixer design—Tilt-head
Attachment hub (power outlet)—No
Pulse functionYesYes
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionNoYes
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hookWhisk, Dough hook, Splash guard
Number of accessories25
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, MixKnead, Mix, Blend, Cook
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Cord length—1 m
Weight4.2 kg2.2 kg
Width338 mm209 mm
Height308 mm320 mm
Depth220 mm351 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare