3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. MMC800CW vs Bella Evo

Gorenje MMC800CW vs Klarstein Bella Evo

What MMC800CW does better (0) and where Bella Evo wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Gorenje MMC800CW
Gorenje · 2025MMC800CW
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ US$65
vs
Klarstein Bella Evo
Klarstein · 2025Bella Evo
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
3.9Power & capacity6.5
3.3Versatility9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

MMC800CWBella Evo
338 × 308220230 × 372343
MMC800CWBella EvoDifference
Height308 mm372 mm−64 mm
Width338 mm230 mm+108 mm
Depth220 mm343 mm−123 mm
Weight4.2 kg4.4 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MMC800CW better than Bella Evo?

MMC800CW has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Bella Evo better than MMC800CW?

  1. Power800 W vs 1,500 W+88%
  2. Speed settings6 vs 122×
  3. Planetary mixing actionNo · MMC800CW: Yes
  4. Number of accessories2 vs 42×
  5. Heating / cooking functionNo · MMC800CW: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Gorenje MMC800CWGorenje MMC800CW≈ US$654.0
Power & capacity
Power800 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l5 l
Speed settings612
Top speed—17,000 rpm
Max. dough per batch—1 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoYes
Pulse functionYesYes
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionNoYes
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hookWhisk, Dough hook, Splash guard
Number of accessories24
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, MixKnead, Whisk, Mix, Chop, Blend, Cook
Controls & smart
Display—None (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Weight4.2 kg4.4 kg
Width338 mm230 mm
Height308 mm372 mm
Depth220 mm343 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare