2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mastro Pocket RB01 vs FP800

Girmi Mastro Pocket RB01 vs TurboTronic FP800

What Mastro Pocket RB01 does better (1) and where FP800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Girmi Mastro Pocket RB01
Girmi · 2024Mastro Pocket RB01
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$65
vs
TurboTronic FP800
TurboTronic · 2025FP800
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
2.3Power & capacity3.4
2.4Versatility4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mastro Pocket RB01FP800
160 × 300150210 × 360194
Mastro Pocket RB01FP800Difference
Height300 mm360 mm−60 mm
Width160 mm210 mm−50 mm
Depth150 mm194 mm−44 mm
Weight1 kg1.6 kg−0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mastro Pocket RB01 better than FP800?

  1. Number of accessories2 vs 12×

Why is FP800 better than Mastro Pocket RB01?

  1. Power300 W vs 800 W2.7×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)0.6 l vs 1.2 l2×
Specifications

Side by side

TurboTronic FP800TurboTronic FP800≈ US$555.7
Power & capacity
Power300 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)0.6 l1.2 l
Speed settings22
Mixing & processing
Attachment hub (power outlet)—No
Pulse function—Yes
Soft start—No
Attachments includedSlicing discsCitrus press
Number of accessories21
Cooking modes
FunctionsChopKnead, Mix, Chop, Slice, Blend
Controls & smart
Timer—No
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
Weight1 kg1.6 kg
Width160 mm210 mm
Height300 mm360 mm
Depth150 mm194 mm
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare