2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. G20137 vs KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker

G3 Ferrari G20137 vs Kenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker

What G20137 does better (2) and where KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker wins (4) — every spec side by side.

G3 Ferrari G20137
G3 Ferrari · 2022G20137
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$340
Higher score
vs
Kenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$420
9.6Power & capacity6.0
2.6Versatility8.1
7.8Controls & convenience8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

G20137KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
400 × 350250395 × 315225
G20137KVC85 Titanium Chef BakerDifference
Height350 mm315 mm+35 mm
Width400 mm395 mm+5 mm
Depth250 mm225 mm+25 mm
Weight8.1 kg11.7 kg−3.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is G20137 better than KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 5 l+60%
  2. Power1,800 W vs 1,200 W+50%

Why is KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker better than G20137?

  1. Number of accessories2 vs 84×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · G20137: Yes
  3. Attachment hub (power outlet)No · G20137: Yes
  4. Pulse functionNo · G20137: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

G3 Ferrari G20137G3 Ferrari G20137≈ US$3408.8
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l5 l
Speed settings10—
Max. dough per batch—2.2 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoNo
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoYes
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scale—Yes
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Blender jug—1.6 l
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhiskWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Spatula, Scale
Number of accessories28
Cooking modes
FunctionsKneadKnead, Weigh
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
TimerYesYes
App control—No
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
HousingMetal—
Weight8.1 kg11.7 kg
Width400 mm395 mm
Height350 mm315 mm
Depth250 mm225 mm
Colours—Silver
Series—Kenwood Chef Baker
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare