2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FGR65 vs R301001 VENTO

Fagor FGR65 vs Remoska R301001 VENTO

What FGR65 does better (3) and where R301001 VENTO wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fagor FGR65
Fagor · 2025FGR65
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
vs
Remoska R301001 VENTO
Remoska · 2025R301001 VENTO
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$90
5.1Power & capacity3.4
6.1Controls & convenience6.7

Why is FGR65 better than R301001 VENTO?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 1,350 W+19%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 5.5 l+18%
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · R301001 VENTO: No

Why is R301001 VENTO better than FGR65?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Fagor FGR65Fagor FGR65≈ US$955.8
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,350 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l5.5 l
Automatic programmes8—
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Reheat
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width330 mm—
Height340 mm—
Depth340 mm—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare