2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 716890000 vs PHAF

ETA 716890000 vs Philco PHAF

What 716890000 does better (1) and where PHAF wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ETA 716890000
ETA · 2025716890000
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$110
vs
Philco PHAF
Philco · 2025PHAF
6.1Score
3 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity5.8
6.7Controls & convenience4.3

Why is 716890000 better than PHAF?

  1. Viewing windowYes · PHAF: No

Why is PHAF better than 716890000?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 2,100 W+24%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 5.5 l+10%
  3. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

ETA 716890000ETA 716890000≈ US$1105.3
Philco PHAFPhilco PHAF≈ US$1106.1
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,100 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l5.5 l
Automatic programmes—6
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNo—
BakingNo—
Grill functionNo—
DehydratingNo—
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
Timer—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare