2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. EAFD11B vs PHAO

Electrolux EAFD11B vs Philco PHAO

What EAFD11B does better (2) and where PHAO wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Electrolux EAFD11B
Electrolux · 2026EAFD11B
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$270
Higher score
vs
Philco PHAO
Philco · 2025PHAO
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ US$290
9.1Power & capacity9.8
9.8Versatility4.1
2.0Controls & convenience4.3

Why is EAFD11B better than PHAO?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Power2,700 W vs 2,250 W+20%

Why is PHAO better than EAFD11B?

  1. Automatic programmes8 vs 162×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)11 l vs 15 l+36%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
  4. TimerNo · EAFD11B: Yes
  5. Max. temperature200 °C vs 220 °C+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Electrolux EAFD11BElectrolux EAFD11B≈ US$2709.2
Philco PHAOPhilco PHAO≈ US$2908.6
Power & capacity
Power2,700 W2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)11 l15 l
Automatic programmes816
Max. temperature200 °C220 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Reheat
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishYes—
Viewing windowNoNo
Interior lightYesYes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Height320 mm—
ColoursBlackWhite, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare