2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. EAF3B vs Multi Taste 1550

Electrolux EAF3B vs WMF Multi Taste 1550

What EAF3B does better (1) and where Multi Taste 1550 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Electrolux EAF3B
Electrolux · 2024EAF3B
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
vs
WMF Multi Taste 1550
WMF · 2024Multi Taste 1550
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
2.2Power & capacity3.0
4.1Versatility9.5
8.7Controls & convenience5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

EAF3BMulti Taste 1550
327 × 274284375 × 270
EAF3BMulti Taste 1550Difference
Height274 mm270 mm+4 mm
Width327 mm375 mm−48 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is EAF3B better than Multi Taste 1550?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is Multi Taste 1550 better than EAF3B?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.3 l vs 4.2 l+27%
  2. Power1,350 W vs 1,550 W+15%
  3. BakingNo · EAF3B: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · EAF3B: Yes
  5. DehydratingNo · EAF3B: Yes
  6. Keep warmNo · EAF3B: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Electrolux EAF3BElectrolux EAF3B≈ US$1404.3
Power & capacity
Power1,350 W1,550 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.3 l4.2 l
Max. temperature180 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width327 mm375 mm
Height274 mm270 mm
Depth284 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare