- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- EAF12B vs AirCook TrioZone Q636
Electrolux EAF12B vs TESLA AirCook TrioZone Q636
What EAF12B does better (1) and where AirCook TrioZone Q636 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Power & capacity7.3
5.4Versatility8.6
2.5Controls & convenience7.0
Why is EAF12B better than AirCook TrioZone Q636?
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is AirCook TrioZone Q636 better than EAF12B?
- Power1,800 W vs 2,800 W+56%
- BakingNo · EAF12B: Yes
- Grill functionNo · EAF12B: Yes
- Non-stick coatingNo · EAF12B: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,800 W | 2,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 12 l | 12 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 3 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Cook, Sauté, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Pizza |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Rotating basket / rotisserie | Yes | — |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | LCD |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Glass | Ceramic |
| Colours | Black | — |
