- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- SC HA 1020 vs I-Coach Touch QB9518
Efbe-Schott SC HA 1020 vs Tefal I-Coach Touch QB9518
What SC HA 1020 does better (1) and where I-Coach Touch QB9518 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Controls & convenience3.4
Why is SC HA 1020 better than I-Coach Touch QB9518?
- Dishwasher-safe partsYes · I-Coach Touch QB9518: No
Why is I-Coach Touch QB9518 better than SC HA 1020?
- Power1,000 W vs 1,200 W+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,000 W | 1,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 2 l | — |
| Speed settings | 11 | — |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | — |
| Pulse function | No | — |
| Soft start | No | — |
| Built-in scale | Yes | — |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | Yes |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Dough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basket, Scale, Measuring cup, Recipe book | — |
| Number of accessories | 9 | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Mix, Chop, Slice, Blend, Weigh, Cook | Knead, Cook |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LED | — |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| App control | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Cord length | 0.8 m | — |
| Weight | 5.8 kg | — |
| Width | 220 mm | — |
| Height | 400 mm | — |
| Depth | 310 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Efbe-Schott SC HA 1020vsKenwood CookEasy+ CCL50
5.14.2
vs
Tefal I-Coach Touch QB9518vsSilvercrest Monsieur Cuisine compact SMCC 1100
vs
Tefal I-Coach Touch QB9518vsCREATE Chefbot Touch Pro Connect
vs
Tefal I-Coach Touch QB9518vsConcept RM9000
vs
Tefal I-Coach Touch QB9518vsChefRobot UltraCook CR-7
vs
Cecotec Mambo 11090 HabanavsTefal I-Coach Touch QB9518