2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 8300 Dual Fry vs FRH 1700

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1700

What AF 8300 Dual Fry does better (2) and where FRH 1700 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry
ECG · 2023AF 8300 Dual Fry
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity7.3
9.4Versatility8.9
6.4Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 8300 Dual FryFRH 1700
398 × 332300260 × 300470
AF 8300 Dual FryFRH 1700Difference
Height332 mm300 mm+32 mm
Width398 mm260 mm+138 mm
Depth300 mm470 mm−170 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 8300 Dual Fry better than FRH 1700?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l vs 8 l+4%

Why is FRH 1700 better than AF 8300 Dual Fry?

  1. Power700 W vs 1,700 W2.4×
  2. Keep warmNo · AF 8300 Dual Fry: Yes
  3. Viewing windowNo · AF 8300 Dual Fry: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l8 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishNo—
Viewing windowNoYes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLED
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width398 mm260 mm
Height332 mm300 mm
Depth300 mm470 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare