2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 8300 Dual Fry vs Fry Type 6 Air Window

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry vs R.G.V. Fry Type 6 Air Window

What AF 8300 Dual Fry does better (6) and where Fry Type 6 Air Window wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry
ECG · 2023AF 8300 Dual Fry
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ US$85
vs
R.G.V. Fry Type 6 Air Window
R.G.V. · 2023Fry Type 6 Air Window
7.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity7.6
9.4Versatility5.3
6.4Controls & convenience7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 8300 Dual FryFry Type 6 Air Window
398 × 332300332 × 325271
AF 8300 Dual FryFry Type 6 Air WindowDifference
Height332 mm325 mm+7 mm
Width398 mm332 mm+66 mm
Depth300 mm271 mm+29 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 8300 Dual Fry better than Fry Type 6 Air Window?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l vs 6 l+38%
  3. Min. temperature30 °C vs 60 °C2×
  4. BakingYes · Fry Type 6 Air Window: No
  5. Grill functionYes · Fry Type 6 Air Window: No
  6. Non-stick coatingYes · Fry Type 6 Air Window: No

Why is Fry Type 6 Air Window better than AF 8300 Dual Fry?

  1. Power700 W vs 1,700 W2.4×
  2. Viewing windowNo · AF 8300 Dual Fry: Yes
  3. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l6 l
Automatic programmes—12
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature30 °C60 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishNo—
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—90 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width398 mm332 mm
Height332 mm325 mm
Depth300 mm271 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare