2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 8300 Dual Fry vs MF-CY75AB

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry vs Midea MF-CY75AB

What AF 8300 Dual Fry does better (2) and where MF-CY75AB wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ECG AF 8300 Dual Fry
ECG · 2023AF 8300 Dual Fry
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Midea MF-CY75AB
Midea · 2023MF-CY75AB
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$75
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity6.2
9.4Versatility7.7
6.4Controls & convenience8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 8300 Dual FryMF-CY75AB
398 × 332300312 × 320315
AF 8300 Dual FryMF-CY75ABDifference
Height332 mm320 mm+12 mm
Width398 mm312 mm+86 mm
Depth300 mm315 mm−15 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 8300 Dual Fry better than MF-CY75AB?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l vs 7 l+19%

Why is MF-CY75AB better than AF 8300 Dual Fry?

  1. Power700 W vs 1,650 W2.4×
  2. Viewing windowNo · AF 8300 Dual Fry: Yes
  3. DisplayLED vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Midea MF-CY75ABMidea MF-CY75AB≈ US$758.2
Power & capacity
Power700 W1,650 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l7 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry, Bake, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishNo—
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLCD
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticMetal
Width398 mm312 mm
Height332 mm320 mm
Depth300 mm315 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare