2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 6000 vs NA220

ECG AF 6000 vs Philips NA220

What AF 6000 does better (2) and where NA220 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

ECG AF 6000
ECG · 2022AF 6000
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.0Power & capacity4.0
8.6Versatility8.9
6.4Controls & convenience8.4

Why is AF 6000 better than NA220?

  1. DisplayLED vs None (dials / switches)
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · NA220: No

Why is NA220 better than AF 6000?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF 6000: Yes
  2. Keep warmNo · AF 6000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

ECG AF 6000ECG AF 6000≈ US$856.9
Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—4.2 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—273 mm
Height—293 mm
Depth—368 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare