2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. GRMC3E vs ON400

Cuisinart GRMC3E vs Ninja ON400

What GRMC3E does better (1) and where ON400 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Cuisinart GRMC3E
Cuisinart · 2022GRMC3E
5.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
vs
Ninja ON400
Ninja · 2024ON400
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
3.5Versatility9.2
7.4Controls & convenience7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

GRMC3EON400
420 × 430240330 × 310350
GRMC3EON400Difference
Height430 mm310 mm+120 mm
Width420 mm330 mm+90 mm
Depth240 mm350 mm−110 mm
Weight5.9 kg6.5 kg−0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GRMC3E better than ON400?

  1. Keep warmYes · ON400: No

Why is ON400 better than GRMC3E?

  1. Pressure cookingNo · GRMC3E: Yes
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.7 l vs 5.7 l+21%
  3. Slow cookingNo · GRMC3E: Yes
  4. Sauté / searNo · GRMC3E: Yes
  5. Air fryingNo · GRMC3E: Yes
  6. BakingNo · GRMC3E: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Cuisinart GRMC3ECuisinart GRMC3E≈ US$1405.8
Ninja ON400Ninja ON400≈ US$1408.2
Power & capacity
Power—1,760 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.7 l5.7 l
Automatic programmes—10
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteam, Keep warmSteam, Sauté, Slow cook, Pressure cook, Air fry, Bake
Pressure cookingNoYes
Slow cookingNoYes
SteamingYesYes
Sauté / searNoYes
Sous-videNoNo
Yoghurt programmeNoNo
Air fryingNoYes
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingMetal—
Weight5.9 kg6.5 kg
Width420 mm330 mm
Height430 mm310 mm
Depth240 mm350 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare