3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Turbo Tower Compact vs Easy Fry Max

Cosori Turbo Tower Compact vs Moulinex Easy Fry Max

What Turbo Tower Compact does better (4) and where Easy Fry Max wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cosori Turbo Tower Compact
Cosori · 2026Turbo Tower Compact
9.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$170
Higher score
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Max
Moulinex · 2026Easy Fry Max
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$170
9.7Power & capacity5.3
8.6Versatility4.1
9.7Controls & convenience5.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Turbo Tower CompactEasy Fry Max
275 × 426365273 × 325375
Turbo Tower CompactEasy Fry MaxDifference
Height426 mm325 mm+101 mm
Width275 mm273 mm+2 mm
Depth365 mm375 mm−10 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Turbo Tower Compact better than Easy Fry Max?

  1. Power2,630 W vs 1,500 W+75%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l vs 5 l+72%
  3. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Easy Fry Max: No
  4. Non-stick coatingYes · Easy Fry Max: No

Why is Easy Fry Max better than Turbo Tower Compact?

Easy Fry Max has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power2,630 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l5 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature230 °C—
Min. temperature35 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width275 mm273 mm
Height426 mm325 mm
Depth365 mm375 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Moulinex Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare