3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 15 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Turbo Tower Compact vs Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0

Cosori Turbo Tower Compact vs Moulinex Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0

What Turbo Tower Compact does better (3) and where Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cosori Turbo Tower Compact
Cosori · 2026Turbo Tower Compact
9.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$170
Higher score
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0
8.8Score
0 advantages≈ US$190
8.6Versatility7.6
9.7Controls & convenience9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Turbo Tower CompactEasy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0
275 × 426365310 × 315396
Turbo Tower CompactEasy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0Difference
Height426 mm315 mm+111 mm
Width275 mm310 mm−35 mm
Depth365 mm396 mm−31 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Turbo Tower Compact better than Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l vs 7 l+23%
  2. TimerYes · Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0: No
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0: No

Why is Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 better than Turbo Tower Compact?

Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power2,630 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l7 l
Max. temperature230 °C—
Min. temperature35 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—Yes
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—Yes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width275 mm310 mm
Height426 mm315 mm
Depth365 mm396 mm
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare