2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dual Blaze vs HD9650

Cosori Dual Blaze vs Philips HD9650

What Dual Blaze does better (2) and where HD9650 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cosori Dual Blaze
Cosori · 2022Dual Blaze
7.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$370
vs
Philips HD9650
Philips · 2017HD9650
8.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$390
Higher score
6.8Power & capacity6.6
8.2Versatility8.9
6.2Controls & convenience8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Dual BlazeHD9650
327 × 352297432 × 304324
Dual BlazeHD9650Difference
Height352 mm304 mm+48 mm
Width327 mm432 mm−105 mm
Depth297 mm324 mm−27 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Dual Blaze better than HD9650?

  1. Non-stick coatingYes · HD9650: No
  2. Max. temperature205 °C vs 180 °C+14%

Why is HD9650 better than Dual Blaze?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Dual Blaze: Yes
  2. Power1,700 W vs 2,225 W+31%
  3. Grill functionNo · Dual Blaze: Yes
  4. DisplayLED vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori Dual BlazeCosori Dual Blaze≈ US$3707.7
Philips HD9650Philips HD9650≈ US$3908.7
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,225 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.4 l—
Max. temperature205 °C180 °C
Min. temperature75 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLCD
App controlYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingAluminiumPlastic
Cord storage—Yes
Width327 mm432 mm
Height352 mm304 mm
Depth297 mm324 mm
Colours—Black
Series—Philips Avance Collection
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare