3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dual Blaze vs PHAO 1015

Cosori Dual Blaze vs Philco PHAO 1015

What Dual Blaze does better (3) and where PHAO 1015 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cosori Dual Blaze
Cosori · 2022Dual Blaze
7.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$370
vs
Philco PHAO 1015
Philco · 2025PHAO 1015
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
6.8Power & capacity9.7
8.2Versatility4.1

Why is Dual Blaze better than PHAO 1015?

  1. BakingYes · PHAO 1015: No
  2. Keep warmYes · PHAO 1015: No
  3. DisplayLED vs None (dials / switches)

Why is PHAO 1015 better than Dual Blaze?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.4 l vs 15 l2.3×
  2. Power1,700 W vs 2,250 W+32%
  3. Max. temperature205 °C vs 220 °C+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori Dual BlazeCosori Dual Blaze≈ US$3707.7
Philco PHAO 1015Philco PHAO 1015≈ US$4109.4
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.4 l15 l
Max. temperature205 °C220 °C
Min. temperature75 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDNone (dials / switches)
App controlYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYes—
HousingAluminiumStainless steel
Width327 mm—
Height352 mm—
Depth297 mm—
Colours—Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare