2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CAF-TF102S vs NA552

Cosori CAF-TF102S vs Philips NA552

What CAF-TF102S does better (2) and where NA552 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cosori CAF-TF102S
Cosori · 2026CAF-TF102S
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$250
vs
Philips NA552
Philips · 2026NA552
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
9.3Power & capacity9.6
4.6Controls & convenience7.5

Why is CAF-TF102S better than NA552?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10 l vs 9 l+11%

Why is NA552 better than CAF-TF102S?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  2. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori CAF-TF102SCosori CAF-TF102S≈ US$2509.1
Philips NA552Philips NA552≈ US$2509.4
Power & capacity
Power2,800 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10 l9 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—40 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate
Steaming—No
Baking—Yes
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—Yes
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones21
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
Timer—Yes
App controlYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingCeramicPlastic
Cord storage—Yes
Width333 mm—
Height312 mm382 mm
Depth517 mm—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare