3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CAF-SE901S vs PHAO 1015

Cosori CAF-SE901S vs Philco PHAO 1015

What CAF-SE901S does better (4) and where PHAO 1015 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cosori CAF-SE901S
Cosori · 2026CAF-SE901S
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$390
Higher score
vs
Philco PHAO 1015
Philco · 2025PHAO 1015
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$410
8.6Power & capacity9.7
8.4Versatility4.1

Why is CAF-SE901S better than PHAO 1015?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Power2,700 W vs 2,250 W+20%
  3. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  4. Max. temperature230 °C vs 220 °C+5%

Why is PHAO 1015 better than CAF-SE901S?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l vs 15 l+74%
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori CAF-SE901SCosori CAF-SE901S≈ US$3909.4
Philco PHAO 1015Philco PHAO 1015≈ US$4109.4
Power & capacity
Power2,700 W2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.6 l15 l
Automatic programmes7—
Max. temperature230 °C220 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, ReheatAir fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishNo—
Viewing windowNo—
Rotating basket / rotisserieYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingYes—
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Width440 mm—
Height295 mm—
Depth325 mm—
ColoursSilverSilver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare