2,674 models · 447 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CAF-P653 vs NA320

Cosori CAF-P653 vs Philips NA320

What CAF-P653 does better (2) and where NA320 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cosori CAF-P653
Cosori · 2024CAF-P653
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$95
5.2Power & capacity3.1
4.1Versatility8.9
4.3Controls & convenience3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

CAF-P653NA320
305 × 300321286 × 294
CAF-P653NA320Difference
Height300 mm294 mm+6 mm
Width305 mm286 mm+19 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CAF-P653 better than NA320?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 4.2 l+48%
  2. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)

Why is NA320 better than CAF-P653?

  1. BakingNo · CAF-P653: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · CAF-P653: Yes
  3. DehydratingNo · CAF-P653: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · CAF-P653: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori CAF-P653Cosori CAF-P653≈ US$855.3
Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.3
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l4.2 l
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingMetalPlastic
Width305 mm286 mm
Height300 mm294 mm
Depth321 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare