- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 9-in-1 Turboblaze vs NA332
Cosori 9-in-1 Turboblaze vs Philips NA332
What 9-in-1 Turboblaze does better (0) and where NA332 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Versatility6.1
Why is 9-in-1 Turboblaze better than NA332?
9-in-1 Turboblaze has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NA332 better than 9-in-1 Turboblaze?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 6.2 l+3%
- Grill functionNo · 9-in-1 Turboblaze: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,700 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 6.2 l |
| Max. temperature | — | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Air fry, Grill |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | — | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | LCD |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Width | — | 324 mm |
| Height | — | 303 mm |
| Depth | — | 436 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Series | — | Philips Airfryer |
