2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. RFRSH24002CB vs NA353

Continental Edison RFRSH24002CB vs Philips NA353

What RFRSH24002CB does better (1) and where NA353 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Continental Edison RFRSH24002CB
Continental Edison · 2024RFRSH24002CB
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ US$120
vs
Philips NA353
Philips · 2024NA353
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
8.8Power & capacity8.6
4.1Versatility6.1

Why is RFRSH24002CB better than NA353?

  1. Max. temperature190 °C vs 180 °C+6%

Why is NA353 better than RFRSH24002CB?

  1. Power2,400 W vs 2,750 W+15%
  2. BakingNo · RFRSH24002CB: Yes
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA353Philips NA353≈ US$1208.6
Power & capacity
Power2,400 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l9 l
Max. temperature190 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
Non-stick coating—No
HousingPlasticPlastic
Height—444 mm
Depth—314 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare