2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FR2500 vs EY1458 Easy Fry Compact

Concept FR2500 vs Tefal EY1458 Easy Fry Compact

What FR2500 does better (2) and where EY1458 Easy Fry Compact wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Concept FR2500
Concept · 2024FR2500
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$60
vs
Tefal EY1458 Easy Fry Compact
4.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
2.6Power & capacity2.8
2.5Versatility7.7
7.0Controls & convenience3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

FR2500EY1458 Easy Fry Compact
235 × 300287230 × 290320
FR2500EY1458 Easy Fry CompactDifference
Height300 mm290 mm+10 mm
Width235 mm230 mm+5 mm
Depth287 mm320 mm−33 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FR2500 better than EY1458 Easy Fry Compact?

  1. DisplayLCD vs LED
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · EY1458 Easy Fry Compact: No

Why is EY1458 Easy Fry Compact better than FR2500?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 3 l+20%
  2. Power1,200 W vs 1,300 W+8%
  3. BakingNo · FR2500: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · FR2500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Concept FR2500Concept FR2500≈ US$604.2
Power & capacity
Power1,200 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l3 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width235 mm230 mm
Height300 mm290 mm
Depth287 mm320 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare