- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Easy Fry Steam Grill
Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Tefal Easy Fry Steam Grill
What Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy does better (1) and where Easy Fry Steam Grill wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Power & capacity4.8
2.0Versatility4.1
3.0Controls & convenience3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthyEasy Fry Steam Grill
| Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy | Easy Fry Steam Grill | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 310 mm | 399 mm | −89 mm |
| Width | 470 mm | 324 mm | +146 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy better than Easy Fry Steam Grill?
- Max. temperature240 °C vs 180 °C+33%
Why is Easy Fry Steam Grill better than Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy?
- Power1,350 W vs 1,700 W+26%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,350 W | 1,700 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 6.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 240 °C | 180 °C |
| Min. temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Max. timer | 90 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 470 mm | 324 mm |
| Height | 310 mm | 399 mm |
| Depth | — | 407 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Series | — | Tefal Easy Fry |
