2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Easy Fry Steam Grill

Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Tefal Easy Fry Steam Grill

What Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy does better (1) and where Easy Fry Steam Grill wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$160
vs
Tefal Easy Fry Steam Grill
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$160
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity4.7
2.0Versatility4.1
3.0Controls & convenience3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthyEasy Fry Steam Grill
470 × 310324 × 399407
Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthyEasy Fry Steam GrillDifference
Height310 mm399 mm−89 mm
Width470 mm324 mm+146 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy better than Easy Fry Steam Grill?

  1. Max. temperature240 °C vs 180 °C+33%

Why is Easy Fry Steam Grill better than Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy?

  1. Power1,350 W vs 1,700 W+26%
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,350 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—6.5 l
Automatic programmes8—
Max. temperature240 °C180 °C
Min. temperature100 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
TimerYes—
Max. timer90 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width470 mm324 mm
Height310 mm399 mm
Depth—407 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare