- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs SHFD 1350
Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Silvercrest SHFD 1350
What Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy does better (1) and where SHFD 1350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Power & capacity2.8
2.0Versatility7.7
3.0Controls & convenience7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthySHFD 1350
| Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy | SHFD 1350 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 310 mm | 305 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 470 mm | 265 mm | +205 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy better than SHFD 1350?
- Max. temperature240 °C vs 200 °C+20%
Why is SHFD 1350 better than Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy?
- BakingNo · Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy: Yes
- Grill functionNo · Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- Non-stick coatingNo · Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,350 W | 1,350 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 2.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 240 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Food capacity | — | 0.5 kg |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 90 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 470 mm | 265 mm |
| Height | 310 mm | 305 mm |
| Depth | — | 310 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
