- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs EcoFrit Light FG94
Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs Girmi EcoFrit Light FG94
What Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy does better (1) and where EcoFrit Light FG94 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Power & capacity3.2
2.0Versatility2.5
3.0Controls & convenience6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthyEcoFrit Light FG94
| Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy | EcoFrit Light FG94 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 310 mm | 350 mm | −40 mm |
| Width | 470 mm | 255 mm | +215 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy better than EcoFrit Light FG94?
- Max. temperature240 °C vs 200 °C+20%
Why is EcoFrit Light FG94 better than Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy?
- Power1,350 W vs 1,400 W+4%
- Non-stick coatingNo · Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy: Yes
- Min. temperature100 °C vs 80 °C+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,350 W | 1,400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 3.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 240 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 100 °C | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 90 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 470 mm | 255 mm |
| Height | 310 mm | 350 mm |
| Depth | — | 305 mm |
| Colours | Black | White |
