- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs G10125
Cecotec Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy vs G3 Ferrari G10125
What Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy does better (1) and where G10125 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Power & capacity3.2
2.0Versatility4.1
3.0Controls & convenience7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Turbo Cecofry 4D HealthyG10125
| Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy | G10125 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 310 mm | 315 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 470 mm | 260 mm | +210 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy better than G10125?
- Max. temperature240 °C vs 180 °C+33%
Why is G10125 better than Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy?
- Power1,350 W vs 1,500 W+11%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
- Non-stick coatingNo · Turbo Cecofry 4D Healthy: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,350 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 3.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 240 °C | 180 °C |
| Min. temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 90 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 470 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 310 mm | 315 mm |
| Depth | — | 340 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
