2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo Touch Habana vs CookEasy+ CCL50

Cecotec Mambo Touch Habana vs Kenwood CookEasy+ CCL50

What Mambo Touch Habana does better (2) and where CookEasy+ CCL50 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo Touch Habana
Cecotec · 2022Mambo Touch Habana
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$550
Higher score
vs
Kenwood CookEasy+ CCL50
Kenwood · 2019CookEasy+ CCL50
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$540
2.3Versatility3.9
7.2Controls & convenience2.7

Why is Mambo Touch Habana better than CookEasy+ CCL50?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 550 W2.9×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · CookEasy+ CCL50: No

Why is CookEasy+ CCL50 better than Mambo Touch Habana?

  1. Pulse functionNo · Mambo Touch Habana: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,600 W550 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.3 l—
Mixing & processing
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scaleNo—
Heating / cooking functionYesYes
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedSteamer basketScale
Number of accessories11
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, Crush ice, Cook, Steam, RoastCook
SteamingYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCD—
TimerNoNo
App controlYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Metal
ColoursSilver, BlackYellow
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare