- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecomixer Compact 4019 vs FDP301WH
Cecotec Cecomixer Compact 4019 vs Kenwood FDP301WH
What Cecomixer Compact 4019 does better (4) and where FDP301WH wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Power & capacity2.3
4.2Versatility3.9
2.5Controls & convenience8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cecomixer Compact 4019FDP301WH
| Cecomixer Compact 4019 | FDP301WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 340 mm | 365 mm | −25 mm |
| Width | 280 mm | 190 mm | +90 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 200 mm | +200 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cecomixer Compact 4019 better than FDP301WH?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 2.1 l2.4×
- Speed settings5 vs 22.5×
- Power1,000 W vs 800 W+25%
- Number of accessories5 vs 3+67%
Why is FDP301WH better than Cecomixer Compact 4019?
- Pulse functionNo · Cecomixer Compact 4019: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,000 W | 800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 2.1 l |
| Speed settings | 5 | 2 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | — | No |
| Pulse function | No | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | No | — |
| Blender jug | — | 1.2 l |
| Bowl material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Patisserie set | Spatula |
| Number of accessories | 5 | 3 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | Yes |
| Housing | — | Plastic |
| Weight | — | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 280 mm | 190 mm |
| Height | 340 mm | 365 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 200 mm |
| Colours | Silver | White |
| Series | — | Kenwood Multipro Compact |
