- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecomixer Compact 4019 vs Chef KVC3100
Cecotec Cecomixer Compact 4019 vs Kenwood Chef KVC3100
What Cecomixer Compact 4019 does better (1) and where Chef KVC3100 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Power & capacity4.6
4.2Versatility9.3
2.5Controls & convenience2.9
Why is Cecomixer Compact 4019 better than Chef KVC3100?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.6 l+9%
Why is Chef KVC3100 better than Cecomixer Compact 4019?
- Planetary mixing actionNo · Cecomixer Compact 4019: Yes
- Pulse functionNo · Cecomixer Compact 4019: Yes
- Number of accessories5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,000 W | 1,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 4.6 l |
| Speed settings | 5 | — |
| Max. dough per batch | — | 2.7 kg |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | Yes |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | — | Yes |
| Pulse function | No | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Bowl material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Patisserie set | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Spatula, Recipe book |
| Number of accessories | 5 | 6 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix | Knead, Whisk |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Housing | — | Metal |
| Weight | — | 9.4 kg |
| Width | 280 mm | — |
| Height | 340 mm | — |
| Depth | 400 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver | — |
| Series | — | Kenwood Chef |
