2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 vs AF250

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 vs TurboTronic AF250

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 does better (4) and where AF250 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$55
vs
TurboTronic AF250
TurboTronic · 2025AF250
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity5.9
2.5Versatility8.9
7.8Controls & convenience9.5

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 better than AF250?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 1,500 W+13%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 6 l+8%
  3. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  4. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is AF250 better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  2. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  4. DehydratingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  5. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

TurboTronic AF250TurboTronic AF250≈ US$559.0
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l6 l
Automatic programmes1212
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare