2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 vs N27290-56S

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 vs Russell Hobbs N27290-56S

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 does better (1) and where N27290-56S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$55
vs
Russell Hobbs N27290-56S
Russell Hobbs · 2024N27290-56S
8.6Score
6 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity8.4
2.5Versatility8.6
7.8Controls & convenience5.1

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500 better than N27290-56S?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is N27290-56S better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 8.5 l+31%
  2. Min. temperature80 °C vs 30 °C2.7×
  3. Power1,700 W vs 1,800 W+6%
  4. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  5. DehydratingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
  6. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 6500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l8.5 l
Automatic programmes12—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C30 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—322 mm
Height—385 mm
Depth—412 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare